|
Mark/Space Releases Public Preview of The Missing Sync for BlackBerry |
February 27th, 2007 by Scott Stevens Categories: Technology. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
I’m pleased to announce that Mark/Space, Inc. has just made available a public preview of The Missing Sync for BlackBerry. While the final release version won’t be available until the end of the quarter, the public preview lets interested individuals take a pre-release version for a spin to check out its features.
The Missing Sync for BlackBerry public preview synchronizes contacts, calendar events, tasks and notes between a Mac running Mac OS X 10.4.8 or later and a USB-capable BlackBerry handset running version 4.0 or later of the BlackBerry operating system. Owners of BlackBerry Pearls or the new 8800 series handsets will enjoy The Missing Sync’s iPhoto album and iTunes playlist syncing (for unprotected audio files). The Missing Sync for BlackBerry really brings out the multimedia capabilities of these devices.
For more information, or to download and try the public preview release, please visit
http ://www.markspace.com/missingsync_blackberry.php
Scott “Seize the Day” Stevens
|
|
Improving Wi-Fi Support |
February 12th, 2007 by Scott Stevens Categories: Business, Technology. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
As I was traveling last Friday I had several hours to kill before my flight left, so where better to sit and do some work than at Denver International Airport, which sports Wi-Fi in the while airport by AT&T and allows roaming partners like my subscription to Boingo.
I found a comfortable spot in a restaurant, opened my laptop and tried to login only finding my “login was rejected”. Much to my dismay, the AT&T “rejected” page did not offer any more specific information or a recharge page like CenturyTel Wi-Fi does. It also does not have “white-listed” links to roaming partners or an account management tool - and since I am a roaming customer through Boingo, I was left wondering how to fix this with Boingo when I can’t get to their website.
I felt trapped and frustrated.
Luckily the “rejected” AT&T Wi-Fi page does offer their toll-free number to call. I gave it a long shot hoping they could tell me some information about my account status or if my user/pass was just wrong (which I knew it was not). At a minimum all I wanted at that point was a number for Boingo.
From my mobile I call the 800 number and reach 3 options of which #1 is a somewhat logical choice as a customer, then the following prompt offering an account issue or tech support option.
Ring, ring, pickup…
I was stunned. I was maybe on hold about the length of time it takes for the call to transfer and a friendly female voice greeted me on the other end. I informed her that I was reaching that page, that I was a Boingo subscriber and that I believed my user/pass was okay.
The customer service rep informed me she could not help with Boingo account questions. My hope balloon just went flat. I asked if she had Boingo’s number and she happily looked it up. We laughed about my inability to get it without my login working. She offered me the number for Boingo which took a minute or two and to my surprise…
She offered to transfer my call.
I was glad to hear that Boingo and AT&T Wi-Fi decided to do the logical thing and at least allow transferring of calls. I accepted her offer and was transferred to Boingo where I was literally picked up on first ring. I asked the rep if they staff 1 customer service agent per subscriber and we laughed.
We got down to business…
We asked for my credentials (not secure ones; last name, first, account city) which I passed with flying colors despite an error from a recent address change. He informed me that the old card we had was expired and I gladly provided him a new card. He suggested a “few minutes” until all systems update and I can get back online.
Total support time: 5 Minutes
Because I was impatient from email withdrawals I tried to login about 30-seconds later with success. My email was downloading and the crisis evaded.
It was an experience of melancholy…
My customer service call was one of the quickest and most successful calls in my life. The reps were friendly and helpful, I was never on hold for significant time and the prompts were easy enough - Kudos to both AT&T and Boingo.
Although it had a happy ending, the beginning was very frustrating and restricting. The obscure message about my rejected login. No conspicuous links to white-listed roaming sites or roaming support pages. No phone numbers to roaming partner support. No mention that their support number would help. No more specific information on my login or account status. No conspicuous helpful troubleshooting tips.
In conclusion:
As a professional who builds Wi-Fi networks (including citywide “Muni” networks) I feel that I have more patience when it comes to these issues and typically resolve problems on my own. However, I was very disappointed at first because of the pure lack of information given to me on the “reject” page. Because I know what technical capabilities are available I felt underserved and confused. Many folks (especially Wi-FI consumers) are tech-savvy and prefer to fix problems on their own.
Unfortunately AT&T only offers phone support as the obvious option - despite an excellent support site that offers lots of good information, it was not an obvious option. Kudos to AT&T for the excellent support info and for the quick and helpful customer service. Thank you Boingo for impressively easy and fast support too.
But AT&T needs to beef up their self-help. Make your support docs the FIRST option, not last or obscurely placed on your very busy home page. Provide more information other than “rejected” for current subscribers. Include white-listed links on the page to roaming partners’ support pages. Include support phone numbers for your roaming partners.
Tech support costs all of us money; it affects ATT and Boingo’s bottom line and thus my cost for the service. Give me more info and let me fix my problem for us. I don’t want to spend ATT’s support money just to call Boingo directly.
I think roaming has come a long way and is doing a great job. These are really my suggestions on how to improve support and roaming support. Overall I am extremely happy with the service from Boingo, their partners and believe it’s worth every penny. I flock to use service where I know I can use my subscription on a reliable network. I prefer this far and above unreliable and illusive free Wi-Fi and even greater over incompatible “one-off” and/or non-roaming hotspots.
If given the chance, I would love nothing more than to help prefect Wi-Fi roaming.
Sincerely,
Scott Stevens
|
|
UPDATE - Missing Sync (OS X) for BlackBerry |
January 11th, 2007 by Scott Stevens Categories: Business, Technology. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
Only a few short days after I posted this and notified all parties of the post, this appeared on the Mark/Space website home page…
The Missing Sync for BlackBerry - Product Preview
Missing Sync reliability and usability, coming soon for BlackBerry.
The Missing Sync for BlackBerry is built on the same technology that has garnered 4.5-mice ratings from Macworld magazine. It’s built to be reliable, so that you can count on your information successfully making the round trip between your Mac and BlackBerry handset.
http://www.markspace.com/missingsync_blackberry.php
Now, I am not taking credit for this showing up, but rather I hope that many readers clicked on the survey link to entice Mark/Space to let us know it’s on the way (plus that little show known as MacWorld where they had a booth ) I have not heard back from Mark/Space when specifically this product is supposed to be released - their site indicates Q1 2007 which gives then only 75 more days.
Also, in what I consider a smart move - a discount to convert from Windows or Palm OS:
Upgrade from a qualifying Missing Sync product
Customers who own one of the Missing Sync products listed below will qualify for a special discounted upgrade to the new Missing Sync for BlackBerry, version 1.0.
Missing Sync for Palm OS
Missing Sync for Windows Mobile
Notably, the product page for Missing Sync for BlackBerry indicates the Pearl specifically when taking about syncing iTunes and iPhotos. This is because of the BlackBerry Pearl’s multimedia enhancements. The new Missing Sync needs OS X 10.4.8 (Universal Binary) and these RIM BlackBerry phones:
Mac System Requirements:
PowerPC G4, PowerPC G5, or Intel processor
Mac OS X, 10.4.8 or higher (Tiger)
Internet connection for product registration
BlackBerry Requirements:
The following devices running version 4.0 and later of the BlackBerry operating system have been tested:
7100 series
7290 (Cingular/T-Mobile)
7250 (Verizon)
7520 (Nextel)
7130 series
8700 series
8707 series
8703 series (Sprint)
8705
8100 series, aka “Pearl”
Other devices may work, but have not been tested.
As I wrote in my prior post that “the Pearl is my iPhone of today”, I now have seen the iPhone debut and retract my statement. The BlackBerry device is good, and I am keeping mine for the next 6 months, but then it’s going into the spare hones closet and the wife and I are getting 8GB Apple iPhones (we have been on Cingular for years and LOVE it)!!!
My beef with the Pearl is it’s entirely too reliant on menus - for EVERYTHING. I have found a steep learning curve that makes the kludgy Palm and icky Windows Mobile OS interfaces seem like generations of ease of use ahead. I also have found the BB to be VERY limiting in it’s customizability. It’s been a good phone and pretty reliable, ad Missing Sync for BlackBerry will make it even more useful, but I’m still not “sold” on it.
Sincerely,
Scott “Patiently Waiting for Apple iPhone” Stevens
|
|
OS X and BlackBerry Sync |
January 6th, 2007 by Scott Stevens Categories: Business, Technology. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
I’ll begin here with the summary and call for cooperation for the sake of OS X and BlackBerry users everywhere! I have included sync instructions at the end of this post FYI.
Mark/Space has EXCELLENT syncing software for phones and OS X users known as the “Missing Sync”. It includes an easy-to-use interface and it works easily and reliably. Currently it handles an advanced sync for platforms like: PalmOS (Treo, etc), Windows Mobile (Blackjack, Q, etc), and even the Sony PSP. The reliability and support for the product is very worth the ~$40 USD cost. If only there was a Missing Sync for BlackBerry (they have a survey for readers to fill out)…
Mark/Space Website
Mark/Space BlackBerry Survey
Research In Motion (RIM)’s BlackBerry is an excellent phone platform, working off years of refinement by the pickiest of consumers. They’ve now added multimedia functionality on the Blackberry Pearl that works pretty well and, if properly marketed, should open up their user base (it’s inexpensive for a Smartphone too!). The Pearl is available through America’s largest - Cingular, T-Mobile, and the Canadian powerhouse Rogers.
BlackBerry Main Website
BlackBerry Pearl Website
So if you own a BlackBerry and use OS X, here’s the good and the bad news…
The Good News - RIM licensed an OS X sync free to BlackBerry owners.
The Bad News - PocketMac is not an easy, reliable, or powerful solution.
MacWorld UK - PLEASE RE-REVIEW PocketMac for BlackBerry!!!
Much to my dismay and seemingly hundreds or thousands of other vocal reviews on various web pages, the sync licensed by BlackBerry for OS X known as PocketMac sucks. I try not to use that word, but there’s no politically correct way to express the unbelievable complications, problems, unreliability, and unintuitive user interface (and installer). The company that makes this software, Information Appliance Associates, also makes PocketPC sync too, but after my PocketMac experience for BlackBerry I agree with a review I read on the web -it is very much NOT worthy of the 4-1/2 of 5 “mice” it was awarded by MacWorld UK.
I look to Mark/Space to help fix this problem, even though it’s not their fault…
MAKE YOUR SOFTWARE for BLACKBERRY!!!
Now, the reason I bring Mark/Space into this is because I believe they can fix this problem by making the “Missing Sync” for BlackBerry. It is my humble opinion that RIM only licensed PocketMac for their users because there was not another solution on the market. Pardon my play on their own words, but I believe that if Mark/Space found the “Missing Sync” for BlackBerry, they could get the license with RIM for their software to be provided to the loyal and growing BlackBerry contingent.
Okay, maybe Mark/Space hasn’t done it because it does not meet the business case, or maybe RIM is too cheap to fork out the licensing fee (I doubt). I still believe that Missing Sync would be a heavily purchased product in their portfolio, even if it were offered standalone like the rest of their products. They currently compete with Information Appliance Associates PocketMac for Windows Mobile and they should be winning that race hands down. If Mark/Space is not winning that race, then a move like this could win them significant accolades (and revenue)!
Click here to fill out the Mark/Space survey to make this happen!
My survey looked like this:
What model BlackBerry is your primary device?
Pearl
Please rate the importance of the following possible features on a scale of 1 to 5:
Sync tasks - 2
Sync notes - 3
Sync calendar events - 5
Sync contacts - 5
Email sync with Apple Mail - 4
Email sync with Microsoft Entourage - 1
Call log backup and access on the Mac - 5
Encrypted password and account number storage/syncing - 2
iPhoto album import/export between Mac and BlackBerry - 5
iTunes playlist/music/podcast download to BlackBerry - 5
Install video files to Blackberry Pearl - 5
Backup and restore of the BlackBerry - 4
Installation of third-party applications from the Mac - 4
Are there any special features not mentioned above that you’d like to see in a BlackBerry sync product for the Mac?
I would like to sync “sent email” on the BlackBerry with my mail program’s Sent folder.
I miss being able to use my Cellular Data (Edge/GPRS/GSM) on my Mac when I have no Wi-Fi.
The BlackBerry has a separate directory for /ringtones from /music. Being able to dip into the /music/ folder from the ringtone menu would be VERY nice (maybe an alias?).
I look to Research In Motion to help fix this problem for BlackBerry users…
ENTICE Mark/Space to MAKE THEIR SOFTWARE for BLACKBERRY!!!
I want to give RIM kudos on the best SmartPhone on the market - BlackBerry Pearl, an inexpensive and reliable Smartphone. Honestly after handling it I almost stopped looking forward to the coming of Apple’s iPhone - that was, until I sync’d it. It is easy to see that RIM required a solution to open their loyal users into the loyal Mac contingent, but this was not the way to do it. Unfortunately the message boards and review columns are full of dissatisfied Mac/BlackBerry users, frustrated newbies and veterans alike, and words of suggestion for Windows and Palm even against their better judgment.
Do it right or don’t do it at all, measure twice and cut once. And with all due respect, which I have for RIM, the move to license PocketMac was just a bad decision among many right decisions. Whether it was haste, lack of options or a lack of thorough research by RIM, PocketMac has turned out to be one bad apple in a “Blue-Ribbon” barrel. It pains me significantly to say that if RIM does not choose to entice Mark/Space to create the Missing Sync for BlackBerry, that they might as well pull the licensed sync software off the shelf.
I apologize in advance for my Blunt on this topic, but I feel very strongly about this. I want to trade in my Treo and convert the rest of the Windows and Palm world if I can. The sales pitch is to but a Mac and a Pearl - I think it’s a match made in Heaven. Both companies have VERY loyal fans and both products work. My iPhone is BlackBerry Pearl … once it works with my computer.
Sincerely,
Scott Stevens
Following are my instructions for PocketMac sync for BlackBerry and OS X.
Read more »
|
|
IEEE Approves 802.16e “Mobile WiMAX” Standard |
December 8th, 2005 by Scott Stevens Categories: Technology. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (IEEE) this morning announced the approval of the 802.16e standard, the specification that will serve as the basis for mobile WiMAX technology.
Though the announcement had been expected since the standard was completed nearly two months ago, the news that 802.16e has been approved by IEEE’s Standards Board represents a major milestone in the development and implementation of mobile, broadband wireless services.
Mobile WiMAX trials and certification testing by the WiMAX Forum could now proceed in the first half of 2006, industry observers say, with products to follow in late 2006 or 2007.
“Essentially we’ve been working for two years to enhance this fixed standard to deal with mobile WiMAX as well,” says Roger Marks, chairman of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group. “A lot of parties have been eager for it to wrap up, so they can move this standard into actual gear.”
The key difference between the fixed and mobile WiMAX standards is that a connection should be maintained using 802.16e even when moving between base stations. The new standard will also enable the introduction of more-efficient OFDMA radio technology.
http://www.unstrung.com/document.asp?doc_id=85346
|
|
Wireless Movements in TV Spectrum |
November 25th, 2005 by Scott Stevens Categories: Technology. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
The House passed a bill today that gives broadcasters until Dec. 31, 2008, to stop using analog spectrum. The bill also authorizes $990 million for a digital-to-analog converter box program to help people get digital TV. The switchover program would be funded from an auction of the vacated wireless spectrum, which will be allocated for use by emergency first-responders and wireless broadband providers.
http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3565691
|
|
Program Integration - RSS, Blogs, Web, and Email |
September 9th, 2005 by Scott Stevens Categories: Technology. [ Comments: 1 ]
|
|
Recently I began using NetNewsWire, an RSS reader program for the Mac. Safari’s RSS is terrible to use, and NNW has integration with a built-in web browser and a Mail-ish approach to viewing RSS … move over Safari, Camino, and Mail?!
Excerpt from a post I made to the NNW discussion community…
I would like to see NetNewsWire become a slightly more powerful browser (url memory/history/bookmarks/pdf and word plugin support) as well as handle POP3 email (at a minimum). With that, I will be able to run a single program for everything. It also needs to support keychain (or support it better).
I would pay for use of such a comprehensive single-software powerhouse.
Build in iCal (i dislike iCal’s interface) and Address Book (like in Entourage) and there would be no stopping this platform. Heck, allow it to plugin to Adium and you will have a truly fully integrated program. (I like Adium over iChat, more customizable interface and multiple service/account support)
Welcome to the future of fast-program switching.
I am sick of switching windows and programs, considering I only use one of these at a time anyways. One RSS tab, one mail tab, browser tabs, and links to AddressBook and iCal, maybe even pop-up style. Let the user configure the look/feel as they wish. I loved Entourage, merge the Apple versions of Entourage in this program and we have a winner. Even on my 12″ I could handle having a slim/Zen-style IM list on the left-left-nav.
YAY! One window for everything - offline (unlike Gmail) = /me happy.
Heck, add an iTunes window, how about making this program a full-on desktop/program manager? I use all these programs and they are all nearly full-window size so I see one-at-a-time anyways. I still feel that iPhoto and Preview should be separate. They are big programs and also have their use in a separate window.
In conclusion…
Merge the following programs: RSS, Browser, Mail, Adium, iTunes, iCal, Addy Book - add a dash of highly customizable interface options (layout, color, etc like Adium), remain spotlight compliant, and you have a program that opens eyes even at Google and Microsoft (and Apple? I feel sometimes they are losing it).
I suggest to NNW - get this done and pose for an immediate acquisition $$$.
|
| |
|
|